Week 3 Blog EDUC 5243

 PART 1:  Based on this framework and the research you examined, what considerations should you take into account as you build an asynchronous professional learning course for your peer?  For instance, will your peer(s) need an introduction to the framework? Are you the lead learner in this initiative? 

Key Considerations for Designing an Asynchronous Professional Learning Course

When you're putting together an asynchronous professional learning course for your colleagues, there are a few important things to keep in mind. Drawing from Gordon's 2022 research and Kolb's Triple E Framework, here's a quick rundown of what to consider.


First thing to do is align objectives with ISTE standards (2025) and introduce the Triple E framework (Kolb, 2011). Structure an intuitive course by organizing contents into modules. Provide opportunities for collaboration and engage with interactive learning and real world applications. With the self paced assessments, include short quizzes that may reinforce learning.


Next, leverage Gordon's Learning Cycle (2022) to help teachers learn through real-world examples, thoughtful reflection, and hands-on practice. Keep your content short and adaptable, while offering useful resources like templates. Invite engagement through discussions, or possibly offering virtual office hours.


Part 2:  Asynchronous learning will need to be supplemented with coaching.  


  • How might you utilize the Cognitive Coaching approach to support teacher technology use practices that are in alignment with the technology integration framework for your institution as well as the ISTE standards?


Even though DoDEA doesn't have a formal framework like Triple E for technology integration Kolb (2011), they do use ISTE Standards to guide how tech is used. I think Cognitive Coaching could be a really effective way to support teachers here (Costa & Garmston, 2016).


By having those planning and reflection conversations, helping teachers set goals that align with ISTE and Triple E framework, and then tailoring support based on what teachers tell us, coaches can really help them use technology in more meaningful ways.


  • What can you bring from the Cognitive Coaching reading into your LMS course to create meaningful learning opportunities for your teachers/peers?  How will you pair this work with targeted (1:1 or small group) coaching?


Integrating Cognitive Coaching into LMS courses enriches the learning experience by encouraging deeper reflection and personalization. Reflective questions, peer feedback, and core coaching strategies help teachers thoughtfully explore and apply new ideas in their practice.


And for an extra boost, combining the course with one-on-one or small group coaching provides amazing support for setting goals and planning lessons. This whole approach is fantastic for building teacher confidence and helping them use technology in a way that's truly meaningful, all while aligning with

ISTE Standards and the Triple E Framework (Kolb, 2011)


PART 3: Reflect upon this process as a facilitator of peer learning. 


By facilitating peer learning, my focus was on creating an asynchronous learning environment where teachers felt comfortable reflecting and building trust. This really helped them put what they learned into practice. What I found most valuable was that peer learning thrives with reflection and coaching, and established standards provide a clear roadmap for growth.


Ultimately, good professional development is continuous and tailored to individual needs. My job was to foster discovery, intentional tech use, and a strong, supportive learning community.


  • Which of the Coach or Educational Leader ISTE Standards did you address?  Discuss your insights. 


My insights gained from this process is learning that teamwork and coaching can really make a difference. What I learned from this process was the profound difference that strong teamwork and effective coaching can make. This experience gave me an opportunity to see how much of an impact teamwork and good coaching can have.


ISTE Coach Standard 1: Change Agent


Being a Change Agent means you're helping to lead a big shift in how the entire school uses technology to make teaching and learning better. For example, a tech coach might help teachers who are having trouble getting students engaged or using traditional methods of tests. They could introduce tools like Kahoot and Google Forms. Then, with some training and ongoing help, more and more teachers start using these tools, which eventually changes how assessments are done across the entire school.


ISTE Educational Leader Standard 2: Visionary Planner

A tech coach sustains digital initiatives that help school leaders and teachers plan how to use technology throughout the year.


The ISTE Essential Conditions (2025) are key to effective coaching and technology use in schools.They help keep schools focused on their goals, support teacher growth, encourage strong leadership, and promote ongoing improvement. With clear policies, reliable tech, student-centered planning, and expert support, these conditions help make professional learning and coaching both effective and sustainable.


Reference:


Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2015). Cognitive Coaching: Developing Self-Directed Leaders and Learners, 3rd Edition. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham. https://drive.google.com/file/d/14-bGtYgfnuZKQk1VxsUW0eC28cG0W8Cp/view?usp=sharing


Gordon, S. P. (2022) Integrating the experiential learning cycle with educational supervision. Journal of Educational Supervision, 5 (3). https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.5.3.1 


International Society for Technology in Education. (2025). ISTE standards: For educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators


International Society for Technology in Education. (2025). ISTE standards: For coaches. 

https://iste.org/standards/coaches 


International Society for Technology in Education. (2025). Essential Conditions for Effective Tech Use in Schools. https://iste.org/non-essential-conditions-for-effective-tech-use-in-schools 


Kolb, L. (2011). Triple E Framework. Triple E Framework. https://www.tripleeframework.com/ 


Comments

  1. This is a great post! You have clearly identified key considerations for building an effective asynchronous course. You connect your course design to the ISTE standards and the Triple E Framework. This shows that you are building on the best practices in educational technology. Your use of Gordon's Learning Cycle to guide the learning process is a great addition. This ensures that the course is not just about content delivery, but about meaningful application and reflection. Great work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment